Tweets

Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
The main point I'm trying to emphasize: the best business opportunities 1000x our efforts.

Too often we equate "more effort = more success."

But in business, you could apply the same amount of effort to two ideas, but one could do 1000x better than the other.
⟳ 1 ♡ 32
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @petersuhm
@petersuhm @WarrenBuffett I think this fits with the framework I'm describing though.

It's another reason business isn't like baseball: you don't need to stay committed to a "swing" you've already taken.

Part of making better bets is being able to move on from a bad bet.
⟳ 0 ♡ 2
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
How does this apply to indie entrepreneurs?

We have to get better at making bets. We can't, as @warrenbuffett says, "swing at every pitch."

Do your research: make sure there's some "pull" from the market. Don't go after every opportunity.

Only swing for the best pitches.
⟳ 2 ♡ 28
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
Warren Buffet's investment strategy relied on making better bets.

As @billgates explained in HBR:

"Warren says that in your lifetime you should swing at only a couple dozen pitches, and he advises doing careful homework so that the few swings you do take are hits."
⟳ 1 ♡ 20
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
To me, it's fascinating that two people can invest the same amount of time, money, and resources, and one person can get 10x, 100x, or 1000x better results.

Some of this can be explained by "luck," but this multiplication effect can also be achieved by making better bets.
⟳ 0 ♡ 20
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Back in 2001, Bob and Jane each picked a stock and invested $1,000.

Bob picked IBM.
Jane picked Apple.

Bob's $1,000 investment turned into $2,643
Jane's $1,000 investment turned into $903,471

This is the "effort/reward conundrum:" some actions produce wildly better results.
⟳ 14 ♡ 124
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @nowendwell
@nowendwell Definitely add social proof/testimonials to that page.

Your biggest hurdle will be convincing folks that they can trust you.

Knowing that other people use it (and being able to see their human faces) will help.
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @MrSimonBennett
@MrSimonBennett It's going to be hard for you to rank for "AWS backup," "digital ocean backup" etc...

BUT, you might be able to rank on YouTube for those keywords!

"Hi everybody. Here's a simple way to backup your Digital Ocean droplets."
⟳ 0 ♡ 2
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @oktuned
@oktuned I would put keywords in your headline that describe (explicitly) what your software is/does.

For example, your competitor put their top "search intent" keywords into their headline.
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @ryanseanbadger
@ryanseanbadger Make sure you have a good listing on all of these "alternative to" sites.

When a customer has a good experience with you, ask them to leave you a review on these top sites.
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @charliprangley
@charliprangley You're doing so much right here! 🙌

One suggestion: add testimonials / social proof of people who use/admire the font.

"Designers like this, use a font like Grayscale."

Another idea: offer influential YouTubers the font for use as titles in their videos in exchange for promo.
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
Idea #3

It really pays to own a topic on YouTube:

ie. If you have "software for plumbers" you should be a top result for that phrase on YouTube.

To build social proof (people are more likely to click on videos with lots of views), try running an ad campaign for that video.
⟳ 0 ♡ 2
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @michaeldyrynda
@michaeldyrynda I would make your homepage headline explicit:
"Scheduled task monitoring for Laravel"

This should help with search results.

Also: keep focusing on SEO. You need to climb this page of results best you can (currently only your FAQ is ranking).
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
@Swizec what’s it like being at an outdoor conference?
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
@marcmaron loved your interview with @tonyhawk. 👍

I watched Tony’s doc right after, and really enjoyed it.

That amount of persistence, over that length of time, is inspirational.
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
👋 If you host a podcast, and aren’t currently using @TransistorFM for hosting, could you DM me?

I have something new I’d like to test out with a few folks.

Thanks! 🙌
⟳ 5 ♡ 11
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
SMS providers must ❤️ 2FA.
⟳ 0 ♡ 9
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
it's just weird that we're a bunch of static smiling avatars typing stuff in boxes to each other.
⟳ 2 ♡ 30
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @Danenania
@Danenania Better question: how can we innovate and reform old systems while minimizing suffering? (And maximizing the benefits for working-class people)
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
Don't get too caught up with my Uber example.

Uber may have disrupted a "bad system," but that doesn't mean the answer is Uber.

Better question: how can we innovate and reform old systems while minimizing suffering? (And maximizing the benefits for working-class people)
⟳ 0 ♡ 5
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @Danenania
@Danenania We don't know what the "most likely alternative" was, because we can't run that a/b test.

There may have been other innovative solutions (outside of government regulation) that weren't able to emerge because Uber was "moving fast and breaking things."
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @sousoneca
@sousoneca Don't get too caught up in the example.

Just because Uber disrupted a bad system, doesn't mean the answer is "Uber's system."

Maybe, the answer is to reform the existing system!
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @volkandkaya
@volkandkaya A big part of the solution will be clarifying society's values around innovation:

1. Innovation can't just benefit elites
2. Innovators should be held accountable when they say something will benefit broader society (does it really?)
3. Disruptors can't break the law
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
It's easy for tech workers to get excited about disruption because (most of the time) we're not the ones being disrupted.

We have nice jobs, in climate-controlled offices, with good paychecks.

We're largely immune from the impacts of what we create.

That has to change.
⟳ 0 ♡ 13
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
The problem with tech "disruption" is that it disrupts the lives of regular working people, without giving them any of the upsides.
⟳ 0 ♡ 7
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
We shouldn't call anything "innovative" (AI, web3, social, self-driving cars, robotics, etc) until we've fully considered the social ramifications of said innovations.

Specifically: WHO benefits? If the benefits only flow to an elite 10%, that's not true innovation.
⟳ 1 ♡ 12
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
I've been thinking a lot about the taxi drivers I saw protesting Uber in 2015.

At the time I was a "startup guy," and was excited to see Uber disrupt the taxi industry.

Now, it makes me sad. Uber came in without any licensing and disrupted a lot of livelihoods.
⟳ 0 ♡ 3
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
For too long, the tech industry has embraced "disruption" without considering the human lives we're disrupting.
⟳ 6 ♡ 36
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
Some choices do just seem to be big wins (and the right call).

Many, however, are hard to evaluate as to how effective our assumptions were.
⟳ 0 ♡ 4
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Most decisions in life can’t be be a/b tested so we actually have no idea if we’re making the optimal choice?
⟳ 4 ♡ 31
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @bohlenlabs
@bohlenlabs @newsbundler Yes, it could be.

As long as you’re sure the “number of people starting paid newsletters” is sufficiently high to give you the visitor —> trial —> conversion you need.
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @aprildunford
@aprildunford @waithash @TransistorFM Just trying to figure out how this is quantified.

When you say “beat the market leaders” do you just mean “choose your product over the alternatives at a sufficiently high rate to give you the level of success you desire as a founder?”
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
The goal for new founders:

Consistent, growing, recurring revenue that reaches your minimum benchmark (and hopefully, exceeds it!).

For Jon and I, it was hitting $30k MRR that really changed our lives.

https://justinjackson.ca/30k
⟳ 1 ♡ 17
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @TheIdeaIsland
@TheIdeaIsland Consistent, growing, revenue that reaches the founder’s minimum benchmark (and hopefully, exceeds it!) is the goal. 👍
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @waithash
@waithash @aprildunford I guess it depends on your definition of "beat the market leaders."

@TransistorFM isn't beating our competitors in terms of market share (yet), but even with ~1.81% of the paid podcast hosting market, we're doing really well. 👍
⟳ 0 ♡ 4
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @housecor
@housecor Lots of other electric cars on the market now: Kia, Hyundai, Nissan, etc

And lots of reasons to have serious concerns about Tesla’s leadership.

(I have a Tesla and like the car)
⟳ 0 ♡ 3
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @philipyoungg
@philipyoungg @stayinsession It really depends!

If you're already at a level of financial freedom that's working for you, you enjoy the work, and growth is still outrunning churn, that could be a good fit. 👍

But if it's not giving you the life you desire, it might be time to look at other opportunities.
⟳ 0 ♡ 3
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
How do you know if you're working on a bad business idea?

Bad ideas are hungry: they consume whatever energy, money, or time you throw at them, without giving you anything back.

Good businesses will (eventually) magnify your effort, and give you high returns.
⟳ 3 ♡ 34
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @benbarbersmith
@benbarbersmith It can take some time for this kind of momentum to show up.

Our first 10 months of Transistor were largely reliant on Jon and me constantly putting fuel into the business.

In month 11, we started seeing tons of strangers signing up, easily, with very little work on our side.
⟳ 0 ♡ 4
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @logicalicy
@logicalicy Yes. In business, forward momentum doesn't usually come from "getting more things done."

In business, progress looks like customers signing up, and paying you in sufficient numbers.
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @ChristineCarril
@ChristineCarril I've been there! Such a hard realization.

But when a business is completely reliant on you for its fuel, it can't be sustained.
⟳ 0 ♡ 2