Tweets

Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @RikNieu
@RikNieu We don’t need to convince every citizen: we just need to lobby governments to create the policy.
⟳ 0 ♡ 3
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
We need to push our governments to create policy that dramatically decreases our carbon emissions.

“If we manage to rapidly cut our emissions, restore natural ecosystems and get better at preventing wildfires, we might put a stop to this cycle.”

https://time.com/6087748/wildfires-around-the-world-photos/
⟳ 1 ♡ 5
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @theothercole
@theothercole @VoiceBlastsfm @meepsapp Help dozens of indie creators and founders succeed using the “indie stack:”

- web
- email
- Stripe

It’s going to be the hub that creators own. Then, they can choose to link out to other platforms: Discord, Slack, etc.
⟳ 0 ♡ 4
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @theothercole
@theothercole @VoiceBlastsfm I agree that there’s a tension between bigger (centralized) platforms and indies.

Open protocols (RSS, email), and indie platforms (VoiceBlasts, @meepsapp) can help hold that tension. 👍

We bring balance to the force.
⟳ 0 ♡ 2
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @michaeldyrynda
@michaeldyrynda @JackEllis Even if they start a gaming platform, they'll still have 209 million+ subscribers who just want to sit on a couch, do nothing, and be entertained.

* not interactivity necessary.
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
Indie creators / podcasters will continue to rely on the two channels they’ve always used to grow their audiences:

- Word of mouth
- Doing arbitrage on bigger platforms
⟳ 0 ♡ 4
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
Whenever I hear VCs and billionaires talk about "podcasting 2.0" they don't mean contributing to an open-source ecosystem where everyone benefits...

For them:

Podcasting 2.0 = "centralized platform we control and can monetize" 😡
⟳ 1 ♡ 13
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @adamrochette
@AdamJRochette One of the reasons I think platforms like Clubhouse and Fireside won't become popular is that... most rooms are not interesting to listen to.
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
Anyone who thinks billionaires (like Cuban) will be "good for podcasting" should read my piece here:

"VCs are particularly hungry for there to be a "centralized platform" for podcasting. That desire serves no one but VCs."

https://justinjackson.ca/podcasts-and-capital
⟳ 0 ♡ 8
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @dohertyjf
@dohertyjf Totally.

I think on the creator side, we'll always be reliant on arbitrage to grow our audiences.
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
Netflix is a $232 billion company that owns their centralized platform. They have some of the best algorithm engineers in the world.

And yet, people are still on Twitter asking for "Netflix recommendations."

It's possible that "more technology" is not going to solve discovery.
⟳ 0 ♡ 7
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
We already have "Podcasting 2.0."

It's the ongoing effort to improve podcasting's RSS spec, with new metadata, new tags, and yes, new interactive possibilities.

Most importantly, it's open source:
#overview--libraries" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://podcastindex-org.github.io/docs-api/#overview--libraries
⟳ 0 ♡ 11
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
You want to make podcasts more like social media?

Have you looked at YouTube comments lately?

Have you seen how creators get penalized by centralized algorithms?

Most importantly: how listeners *actively* searching for these types of features?

(I haven't seen much evidence)
⟳ 1 ♡ 9
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
Lots of folks pushing to make "podcasts more interactive." ✨

Think about Netflix shows, the movies, audiobooks... how have these been made "more in interactive?"

Maybe... there are good channels for interactivity that listeners already use (Reddit, group texts, Twitter).
⟳ 0 ♡ 10
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
People keep talking about podcasting's "discovery problem;" but the people I know, who listen to podcasts regularly, seem to have no problems in finding new shows to listen to. 🤔

If anything, they have the opposite problem: too many good shows to listen to!
⟳ 0 ♡ 30
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
I'll go even further than Tom here. 🌶️

I'm not convinced listeners actually care about any of these things:

- making podcasts "more discoverable"
- making podcasts "more interactive"
- making podcasts "more social"
- the "podcasting 2.0" label https://twitter.com/webby2001/status/1423372126707453967
⟳ 4 ♡ 49
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
@picsiechick @joshuaanderton @meepsapp @ProductHunt You *can* use it as a MailChimp alternative; but it adds a bunch more power:

- ability to take payments + have paid newsletter
- ability to have a directory for subscribers
- ability to easily link to other subscription perks like Discord chat (or Slack chat)
⟳ 0 ♡ 2
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
@theDevBee Totally. I need more of this vibe in my life.
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
My son wanted to order a cheese pizza and eat it on a paddleboard lol 🍕
⟳ 0 ♡ 263
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
After weeks of wildfire smoke, we finally have some clean air on the horizon for #vernonbc! 🙏
⟳ 1 ♡ 11
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @rezzz
@rezzz That’s what was causing my voice loss.
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @rezzz
@rezzz Are you, by chance, on a puffer or allergy meds?
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @iamtomelliot
@iamtomelliot @spencerfry Sorry; I misunderstood you. I thought you were saying my critiques were "lame, broad generalizations." 😉

I've offered lots of examples of why I think VC has systemic issues. 👍
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @iamtomelliot
@iamtomelliot @spencerfry What's wrong with broad critiques?

A systemic problem in the underlying structure is going to require a critique that (broadly) challenges the whole system.
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
I personally wouldn’t take money from a VC who says “their only responsibility is to return money to their LPs.”

VCs should feel some responsibility for the founders they invest in.

VCs & founders also have a shared responsibility towards employees, customers, and society.
⟳ 1 ♡ 10
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
Money has strings attached, but not all capital comes with the same strings. 😉

The underlying structure of the relationship (the incentives, the governance, who controls the money, who has the social influence) will determine "how good of a deal" you get as an entrepreneur.
⟳ 0 ♡ 10
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
In a healthy society, we need to identify and challenge power dynamics.

It's not OK for VCs to put all of the onus on the entrepreneur.

These structures can be fixed. Power can be re-balanced.

But not if VCs wash their hands of all responsibility.
⟳ 0 ♡ 10
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @chrisfosterelli
@chrisfosterelli @mwseibel In a healthy society, we need to identify and challenge power dynamics.

It's not OK for VCs to put all of the onus on the entrepreneur.

These structures can be fixed. Power can be re-balanced.

But not if VCs wash their hands of all responsibility.
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mattwensing
@mattwensing @mwseibel @spencerfry There are lots of real-world examples of these kinds of dynamics.

If you're not hitting the right growth numbers, they are incentivized to ask you to shut down (so they can write off the investment).
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mattwensing
@mattwensing @mwseibel The term sheet doesn't tell the whole story.

VCs have the connections (and often the power) to determine if you will be able to raise subsequent rounds (or if you can be acquired).

That's power.

Putting the onus completely on founders is an abdication of responsibility by VCs.
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @danielzarick
@DanielZarick @mwseibel Except, VCs have the connections (and often the power) to determine if you will be able to raise subsequent rounds (or if you can be acquired).

That's a lot of leverage.

Putting the onus completely on founders is an abdication of responsibility by VCs.
⟳ 0 ♡ 2
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
Capital is not neutral!

Money has influence; it introduces a power dynamic that many VCs exploit.

Michael is using a faulty analogy.

VCs don't just use "words" to influence you; they have real leverage over founders as soon as they invest.
⟳ 1 ♡ 22
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
"A lot of founders are fearful that investors are going to push them to make bad decisions."

@mwseibel: "I'll push back on that. Investors can't hold a gun to your head. If you're influenced by their words that's your inner weakness."

☝️ this rhetoric ignores power dynamics.
⟳ 6 ♡ 56
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Business idea:

💰 Charge $200+
👩‍💻 for a 1-hour Zoom call,
📹 where you evaluate people's streaming setups (camera, mic, lighting, sound, room treatment).
✨ Give them practical tips to improve their setup.
⟳ 4 ♡ 87
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
🤔 what’s Laurinburg, NC like?
⟳ 0 ♡ 1
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @mijustin
Jon and I are still focused on building a company that is:

- Small: no more than 10 people
- Profitable: good margins, low expenses
- Calm: not heavy, complicated, or a chore to run
⟳ 0 ♡ 19
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
@insideyourhead0 @TransistorFM That usually happens if you load the site during a deployment. You can refresh (or hard refresh) and it will load properly. 👍
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @RichJDSmith
@RichJDSmith Haha.

Probably won’t be moving.

Kids are all set here (friends, school, etc)

The smoke definitely sucks, but with climate change lots of places will have problems.
⟳ 0 ♡ 0
Justin Jackson
Justin Jackson@mijustin
Replying to @profwolff
@profwolff But which system is demonstrably better than capitalism?

Is there no place for a “reformed capitalism?”
⟳ 0 ♡ 0