I've been trying out Mastodon. People bill it as a "Twitter alternative." While there are some similarities, it's definitely its own thing.
If you want to try out Mastodon, you'll need to join an instance.
I recommend one of these:
It's similar to an email (email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, etc).
You can still follow people on different servers (you find them in search), and see their posts.
Each instance is run by volunteers, who pay for the server costs and do moderation.
You don't have to stress too much about which instance you choose.
Overall, I'm digging it.
It feels like the early internet (BBS, FidoNet, UseNet, Geocities, message boards). Joining a Mastodon instance is kind of like joining a Geocities "neighborhood" back in the day:
Mastodon has a feature for posts called "Content Warnings."
"Content Warnings are a kindness. If you're part of the #twittermigration, it may seem strange the people use CWs so much here. But, CWs are really helpful. So much of our world is overwhelming, and feed presentation can bombard our nervous systems with triggers. CWs give people time and space to engage with that they have the resources to engage with. It gives them agency. I follow news and politics AND it's helpful for my PTSD to have the chance to take a deep breath *before* I see a post."
Here's an example:
This feature is interesting (especially in light of the conversations we've been having around negativity/pessimism online):
"So much of our world is overwhelming. Content Warnings give people time and space to engage with what they have the resources to engage with. It gives them agency."
I like how this implementation affirms both perspectives "I need to confront/share some (negative) realities with you," and "I need to protect my mental health from a constant stream of negativity."
I should clarify: the "Content Warning" feature isn't just for "trigger warnings." It's also a way of hiding content that folks might find overwhelming/tiring/negative.
For example, in this case, the user is warning others that the post contains commentary about Twitter. Don’t want to see that kind of content? You can ignore the post. If you’re curious, you can expand it to view the full text.
The purpose of this feature is to ensure you're not contributing to someone else's doomscrolling.
Here are a few guides I found helpful:
You can follow me at: email@example.com
You can follow Transistor at: firstname.lastname@example.org